geminigirl: (Angry Woman)
[personal profile] geminigirl
So we're planning a homebirth this winter with the new baby. That means we have to go with out of network providers...and that's fine. By law, in Florida any insurance company that provides maternity benefits must cover homebirths. So we looked at that, looked at the numbers and decided we could afford our expected contribution...insurance is supposed to pay 70%, leaving us with 30% of the midwife's fees plus assorted other expenses like a birth tub if we want one.

A few weeks go, I got a number back from the midwife for our estimated contribution. That number was almost $1000 more than what 30% of the midwife's total fees would be. In other words, nearly 50% instead of 30%. So something doesn't sound right here, and I need to figure out why and where and how to correct it.

I just don't know where to start yet.

Date: 2009-07-08 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com
Is it "usual and customary" nonsense? They pay 70% of an unrealistically low maximum and you pay everything over the maximum, as well as 30% of the first part?

Date: 2009-07-08 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] entirelysonja.livejournal.com
Oy. Good luck getting it straightened out!

Date: 2009-07-08 07:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] erinmdmd.livejournal.com
Ugh, I'm also planning a homebirth next month and my insurance company isn't exactly homebirth friendly (though my state is). I've just been ignoring the issue because it is what it is at this point and I don't feel like arguing the issue with the insurance company right now.

Date: 2009-07-09 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 3-black-cats.livejournal.com
Could the difference be that while Florida law requires your insurance company to cover homebirth, they are covering it under a different rate due to the provider being out of network? Most insurance plans will cover, say 70% if you use an in-network provider, but will only cover at say, 50% if you use an out-of-network provider. They're still providing coverage under the law, but they force you to pay more out of pocket. And they have no obligation, as far as I know, to make sure that they have in-network providers so long as they offer out-of-network benefits (even if those benefits are suckier). Just a thought, and obviously I don't know what type of insurance coverage you have, but that's the first thing that came to mind.

The second thing that came to mind is that perhaps the amount is $1000 higher because you have a deductible which they're assuming you haven't fully met. A fairly good-to-average deductible would be $1000 (which you pay) and then you add 30% of whatever is above and beyond the deductible to figure out your total cost. The 70% co-insurance thing usually only kicks in after you've fully met your deductible.

Also, if you really want to get serious with pursuing this with your insurance company, my advice would be to get the CPT codes that your midwife will be billing with. Call the insurance company when you have those codes, and they will be able to tell you exactly what the allowable expense is. Then ask them if they're going to assess your share of the expense as an in-network service (since they have no in-network midwives who do home birth) or if you're being forced to use your out-of-network benefits.

I deal with this stuff every day at work, and would be happy to offer any help I can to help you sort this out. Good luck! :)

Date: 2009-07-09 03:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 3-black-cats.livejournal.com
Wow, you have an awesome deductible and out-of-network benefit. You're totally right, something doesn't make sense.

And, I envy your insurance coverage. But not the current hassle of trying to figure this thing out.

Unfortunately, the only way to truly know what you'll end up paying is to have the bill submitted to the insurance. And then to defy them and challenge them after the fact. Contrary to popular belief, insurance companies are NOT in the business of providing health care -- they're in the business of making money. Sad but true. Not sure what the solution is, unfortunately.

So sorry you're having this hassle!

Date: 2009-07-09 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fairion.livejournal.com
Wow what a lot to deal with. Good luck.

On a separate note, is there any chance you and Naomi would be willing to come down towards Clermont for a visit? I am afraid to go more than about 5 minutes from Mom's but would love to see you guys. We could do lunch or go swimming in the pool or whatever.

Profile

geminigirl: (Default)
geminigirl

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 31st, 2026 08:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios